• English
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
  • Search
    • About
      • Contact
    • Team
    • Our Practice
      • Patent
        • Patent Prosecution
        • Design
        • Opinions / Litigation
        • Patents – Post Grant Practice
      • Trademark & Copyrights
        • Trademark Counseling and Prosecution
        • Trademark Enforcement
        • Copyright
    • Client Services
      • Resident Clients
      • IP Training Institute
    • Careers
      • Attorneys
      • Law Students
      • Staff
    • More
      • Special Reports
      • IDS Requirement
      • Case Summaries
      • News
      • Events
      • Drafting Services
      • Translation Services
      • Continuing Legal Education
      • USPTO Patent Fee Schedule
    • English
      • 日本語
      • 简体中文
  • Search
    • About
      • Contact
    • Team
    • Our Practice
      • Patent
        • Patent Prosecution
        • Design
        • Opinions / Litigation
        • Patents – Post Grant Practice
      • Trademark & Copyrights
        • Trademark Counseling and Prosecution
        • Trademark Enforcement
        • Copyright
    • Client Services
      • Resident Clients
      • IP Training Institute
    • Careers
      • Attorneys
      • Law Students
      • Staff
    • More
      • Special Reports
      • IDS Requirement
      • Case Summaries
      • News
      • Events
      • Drafting Services
      • Translation Services
      • Continuing Legal Education
      • USPTO Patent Fee Schedule
    • MenuMenu Icon to Open Off-Canvas Menu

    ALARM.COM INC. v. HIRSCHFELD

    March 16, 2022

    ALARM.COM INC. v. HIRSCHFELD, Appeal No. 2021-2102 (Fed. Cir. February 24, 2022).  Before Taranto, Chen, and Cunningham.  Appealed from E.D. Va. (Judge Hilton). (Appealability of ex Parte Reexamination Vacatur)

    • Contact
    • Careers
    • Site Map
    • Disclaimer Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy

    © 2025 Oliff PLC. All Rights Reserved.